Always underpay hospital bills, always double check “explanation of benefits”

A truism: health care providers are quick to overcharge, slow to refund.

This week I learned six lessons to help deal with this:

  1. Pay as little as you can when you leave the provider. This may not work at a doctor’s office because the bill is cut and dried. But hospitalizations are different. Before you leave the hospital, the friendly hospital extortionist comes by to get as much out of you as she can. Pay the absolute minimum you can possibly pay. It’s better to get a bill later–after the claim with insurance is settled–than it is to overpay and fight for a refund.
  2. Don’t pay another cent until the claim is settled. That’s right, until you have the hot little explanation of benefit (EOB) in your hands, don’t pay another cent, except under duress.
  3. Only pay what the EOB says you owe. The EOBs should show exactly what the service provider billed your insurance, any discounts, what your insurer paid, and what you owe. On my insurance, what I owe is the sum of the “deductible” and “copay” fields. Sometimes there are also “non-covered charges.” Do not assume you have to pay the non-covered charges. See the next section.
  4. Question non-covered charges. Sometimes non-covered charges are billing errors. One of my EOBs for a doctor’s visit had $160 of non-covered charges. It turns out that the doctor mis-coded two items. Had I not caught this, I would have owed my doctor all that money. An example legitimate non-covered charge that you would have to pay could be a hospital room upgrade, such as a private room versus a shared room.
  5. Double-check that you actually paid what the EOB says you owe. I printed out every medical payment for the past year and found a corresponding EOB for payment. By double-checking all of this, I have found that I am owed several hundreds of dollars.
  6. If you are owed money, be persistent. None of the five medical care providers I have dealt with this year have voluntarily refunded a single cent I am owed. In fact, had I not called them out on it, one provider would have permanently sat on $500 it owes me. (It was a really dumb billing mistake: one line item was entered twice.) Take careful notes on each call, and be prepared to speak to several people before you get everything resolved.

Attention to detail can easily save you a ton of money. I’m on track for recovering a few hundred dollars for 2004.

I hate car shopping

We have pretty much decided on getting a Nissan Maxima. Mmmm, 255 horses. We want a model with cloth seats and without a sun roof.

Yesterday we found a 2002 Maxima with 56K miles (the one pictured to the right). www.autocheck.com showed a clean title history, and a VIN lookup on www.publicdata.com showed that the previous owner lives in Plano and bought the car new. I found this guy’s phone number but am still not able to reach him.

Anyway, we took the car home for the night. After getting an uncle to help us examine everything, we discovered that parts of the front and rear bumpers are resprayed, and the rear bumper even has a slight wrinkle in one spot. Since much of the original paint was still there, whatever happened may not have been too severe. However, the repaint was done at a really crappy shop. They sprayed the paint in a moist and dirty environment: there was a place where the paint “fell” a bit, and the paint was full of trash. Because of the apparent crappiness, I have to wonder what else wasn’t fixed right.

An under-engine rock shield is also missing, exposing the underside–especially the A/C compressor and hoses–to kicked up junk. True, this isn’t a big deal; a new shield can be bolted in. But why was it missing in the first place? What caused it to fall off? The same event that damaged the bumpers? What else has fallen off? What else was not properly repaired?

Overall, these are not deal-ending issues, but they reduce what we’re willing to pay for the car. We got the car inspected at our local AAA-certified shop ($90), and it checked out fine. It may be mechanically sound. But I still can’t reach the original owner, so how do I know how it was treated or what it was used for?

Anyway, after a few minutes of back and forth at the dealer their best offer was 4.4% above our maximum price. 4.4% is a nontrivial amount of cash, so we walked. Of course we got the crap about how they won’t make enough money, here is what Kelly Blue Book says, etc.

We walked.

Back to square 1, less $90 and a half day of vacation. It’s a learning experience. I won’t be so quick to drive the next car home unless we have a good idea of what we would pay for it.

More on new car buying

I reran the numbers on Buying a new car is a poor financial decision assuming 250,000 usable miles. The numbers more dramatically favor used cars:

Year Current Miles Value (NADA) Depreciation from new Percent of miles “used up” Relative cost per mile of remaining miles

(250000 – current miles)

2004 0 (still on dealer’s lot) $23,850 0% 0% 43% higher than 2000
2003 15000 $20,300 15% 6% 30% higher than 2000
2002 30000 $16,925 29% 12% 15% higher than 2000
2001 45000 $14,875 38% 18% 9% higher than 2000
2000 60000 $12,650 47% 24% baseline

Buying a new car is a poor financial decision

Today I thought more about my views of car buying. I came up with the following as a response to someone who suggested that if you’re going to hold on to a car for 10 years, it’s smartest to buy new. In fact, it’s probably smartest to buy used regardless of your time horizon.

According to http://www.bankrate.com/brm/news/auto/20011226a.asp, a typical new car loses 15%-20% of its value each year in the first three years.

Honda AccordLet’s take the case of a Honda Accord LX V6. Based on friends’ experiences and Consumer Reports reliability ratings going back to 1996, I think it’s reasonable to say that this car will go at least 180,000 miles before requiring costly repairs or becoming unacceptably unreliable.

This chart is based on if you purchased the following cars right now:

Year Current Miles Value (NADA) Depreciation from new Percent of miles “used up” Relative cost per mile of remaining miles

(180000 – current miles)

2004 0 (still on dealer’s lot) $23,850 0% 0% 27% higher than 2000
2003 15000 $20,300 15% 8% 17% higher than 2000
2002 30000 $16,925 29% 17% 8% higher than 2000
2001 45000 $14,875 38% 25% 5% higher than 2000
2000 60000 $12,650 47% 33% baseline

It should be noted that Accords are in demand, limiting your ability to negotiate, and don’t depreciate as badly as many other cars.

Notice how much higher you pay per useful mile for the new car than for the 4-year-old car.

Look at this differently: suppose I had $23,800 sitting around. What is the smartest investment: $23,800 all sunk into a car, or $12,650 sunk into a car and investing the remaining $11,000 in something like a child’s college fund, your own retirement, or a charity? Or if I didn’t have the cash laying around, why double my debt just for the new car smell? What does it say about one’s values when he maximizes his deprecation losses (and debt?) at the expense of better choices?

See http://moneycentral.msn.com/content/Savinganddebt/Saveonacar/P37267.asp another perspective.

Cars are depreciating assets, a liability. It makes sense to reduce exposure to losses by not buying new.

Incorrect Understanding of Wright and Shelby Amendments

My understanding of the Wright and Shelby amendments, which regulate air travel out of Dallas’s Love Field airport, was incorrect. I was in good company: even the Dallas Morning News has it wrong!

According to a 1998 US DOT news release, it appears that the 1979 Wright Amendment permits passenger air travel from Love Field, partially upending a then-11 year old agreement between Dallas and Ft. Worth. Under this agreement, Dallas and Ft. Worth will not use their respective airports to compete against DFW Airport. The 1997 Shelby Amendment enhances the Wright Amendment’s permissiveness by allowing flights to go to 3 more states and also allowing no destination restrictions on flights using planes with fewer than 56 seats. (It is humorous to note that Senator Richard Shelby, the amendment’s namesake, is from Alabama, one of these 3 additional states.)

So without the federal Wright or Shelby Amendments, there may be no passenger air travel out of Dallas Love Field.

Edit: See the comment left in the comments section below. (Click on the Comments link.) Simply repealing the Wright Amendment is not enough; that would invite another round of local lawsuits from Fort Worth, American Airlines, and DFW. Congress needs to clearly say that there shall be no restrictions on flights on Love Field.